PicoSearch


BYTE BACK
KFNX1100AM Listen Live
Air America

BLOND AND HARMONIZED GETTING IT RIGHT AGAINST THE RIGHT sunraysix@excite.com

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Archives







April 12, 2003

BYTE BACK quote of the day
What Is Truth? Written by John R. Cash.
Single release: © 1970, CBS Records.

The old man turned off the radio, said:
"Where did all of the old songs go?
"Kids sure play funny music these days.
"They play it in the strangest ways".
Said: "It looks to me like they've all gone wild.
"It was peaceful back when I was a child."
Well, man could it be that the girls and boys,
Are trying to be heard above your noise?
And the lonely voice of youth cries:
"What is truth?"

A little boy of three sittin' on the floor,
Looks up and says: "Daddy, what is war?"
"Son, that's when people fight and die."
A little boy of three says: "Daddy, why?"
A young man of seventeen in Sunday school,
Being taught the golden rule.
And by the time another year has gone around,
It may be his turn to lay his life down.
Can you blame the voice of youth for asking:
"What is truth?"

A young man sittin' on the witness stand,
The man with the book says: "Raise your hand.
"Repeat after me: I solemnly swear."
The man looked down at his long hair.
And although the young man solemnly swore,
Nobody seemed to hear anymore.
And it didn't really matter if the truth was there:
It was the cut of his clothes and the length of his hair.
And the lonely voice of youth cries:
"What is truth?"

The young girl dancing to the latest beat,
Has found new ways to move her feet.
The young man speaking in the city square,
Is trying to tell somebody that he cares.
Yeah, the ones that you're calling wild,
Are going to be the leaders in a little while.
This whole world's wakin' to a new born day,
And I solemnly swear that it'll be their way.
You better help that voice of youth find:
"What is truth."

And the lonely voice of youth cries:
"What is Truth?"





KEVIN SITES LIVES

Damn. I was hoping along with all CNN-haters that the
CNN newsman had been killed. He does look French, after all.C'est la vie.

Biting sarcasm aside, just read the news on Vince Kern's site. It is a good thing.


April 11, 2003




WCNBDHUSICF?

There's an
Agonist Watch. Don't blink because it won't be around for long. There is not much to watch. Anyone who visited The Agonist before March 19, will remember it as more of an observation-on-culture site. It may stay war-related forever, but I'm guessing not.

So far the A-Watch site is just a collection of other people's comments on Sean-Paul Kelly, who I'm sure was partially targeted because he sounds French.

Oh and those initials are the blog address. We Can Not Blog Decisively Having Understood Something Is Completely Fucked.

But that's just a guess.



LAUGHING OUT LOUD=GOOD

In case anybody cares, people who read this site get a lot more of my serious side, without much of the dry humor, which is my downfall trademark. Here's a little nonpolitical dose of reality from the apartment searching
Ms. Beth.

[W]ow, are there a lot of crappy apartments for rent in the greater Seattle area! I thought I'd take in a sampling of the lower end of the rent spectrum for comparison, and it would now seem that I need to mentally commit myself to spending a couple hundred more a month than I'd originally hoped to spend. I'm not unreasonably picky, but certain things are not negotiable. Things like being able to fit my bed in the bedroom. Like a living room big enough to hold more than a love-seat and a tv tray. A bathroom where I can bend over to dry my hair without taking out the towel rack with my ass.


And as I tour the web a little tonight, I notice that I missed whatever change occurred over at UPYOURS. She's being hosted on Moxie's/Madison Slade's site or something, and has changed her blog look. I went there earlier this week and it was it's usual dildo-flying, French hating, middle-finger waving comfortable home. All that is good for her BTW.



OFF BASE - BULL DURHAM - part 2

"As far as I knew, we weren't speaking. I wasn't even planning to wear makeup.
.

This is Susan Sarandon, on the cancelled Bull Durham celebration. Robbins said he was planning to talk about baseball. And why wouldn't he? He's not war 24/7. He's not a war blogger.

I wish some "liberal institution" had done something equally stupid so I could say - I disagree with that, too.

This is Dale Petroskey., playing the innocent "who me:"
"Certainly people have strong views about this. I'm surprised how much interest it's gotten," Petroskey said..

Yeah, always surprised at the reaction a dumb move has on smarter people.

What we were trying to do was take politics out of this," he said.

With a gesture that did exactly that; one meant only to be a signal.

... "Given the track record of Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon, and the timing - with our troops committed in Iraq - a strong possibility existed that they could have used The Hall of Fame as a backdrop for their views."

So, he didn't even approach Robbins or Sarandon to ask what they were going to do.

And again "comments by the actors "ultimately could put our troops in even more danger," in his original letter was not just making a "We want to save our bottom line" response. It was a public statement and point of view about just what he or the BHOF board thinks dissent is doing to troops.

The BHOF is not a government organization, though they do get $700,000 of federal taxpayer money. That doesn't mean it's above criticism, nor should be. Just ask Bill O Reilly who wanted to boycott Pepsi and then tried to deny it - of course.

Free speech is something I think and would hope people value even more than baseball. Those on the right wing or whomever else isn't blinded by their need to support this war, would see the terrible direction of such base moves, as typified by Petroskey.

I'll remember this as things come along. I'll wait for *your* first comment that some liberal group was being "mean" to some innocent Republican. Wonder if Petroskey has any scheduled speaking experiences?

Also would love to hear Gary Carter - soon-to-be Hall of Fame inductee - come out with a strong political view of some sort. See if they'd cancel his induction ceremony.

And my caveat: Yes, this seems like a small issue. By itself it would be. But it is one example of others that include Sean Hannity -- just an entertainer right? -- distorting Charles Rangel's words as saying US troops are child killers and that Sen. Kerry shouldn't say he would like to see Bush removed from office. Um, I'm sorry that Hassert, Delay and other blank slates have failed to understand the basic tenet of how they got into office - but that's what elections do.




GUESS NOT

One possible URL for my Web site
http://longandshortofit.com has been taken already. Hey Oliver, here's your weiner dog paradise.






REALITY VS REALITY
Read below. What impression are you left with?
When Marines briefly raised the flag after moving into the southern Iraqi city of Umm Qasr in late March, the commander of the war in Iraq Gen. Tommy Franks said he was pleased with their decision to removed the flag quickly.

"I think that, in zeal, people will want to represent that they have achieved a certain milestone," he said, following the Umm Qasr incident. "And if you're from our country, then one of the first things that can pop into the young man's mind is to raise his national colors." But, Franks said, the job "had to do with liberation and not occupation."

Chin, from New York, says that in retrospect he can understand why some people might be upset by the gesture, but he says the American flag wasn't blanketed over Saddam's head in an effort to anger anyone. He says it was just their way of being part of the celebration that was taking place all around them.

"It was a crazy experience. A lot of people — Iraqi people — downstairs below us chanting, and just being able to do that … I'm still blown away," Chin said. "And the flag — it was on the Pentagon when it got hit on 9/11. That was the same flag, and me being from New York, it kind of all goes together a little bit. It was a team effort, which made it even better, you know," he said.


Here's my impression. Franks' "in zeal" verbiage contrasts strongly with the comments from Cpl. Edward Chin that this "zealous and impromptu" moment came 1) through orders from his commanding officers and 2) It was a flag flying over the Pentagon on Sept. 11.

For a brief moment when I saw the pictures I thought "So why have they got all these flags around?" But then I figured, well, American troops are bound to have them around, in barracks, tents etc. Apparently they also have them in secure boxes, under lock and key, ready for any moment of grand propaganda.

ABC NEWS link here. Also via numerous other sites now.

update 12:04 Chin's "following orders" comment was earlier in the story:
"I was just trying my best to get the chain around his neck and put the flag on his head," Chin told ABCNEWS' Good Morning America. "Pretty much at the moment I was just doing what I was told to do by my commanding officer," he said.




April 10, 2003




A REPUBLICAN SPORT

I'm trying real hard not to go off on a curse-filled rant. Simply put, some former Reagan Press Secretary Dale Petroskey, who's now president of the Baseball Hall of Fame, has chosen this week to send a letter out to the stars of Bull Durham saying their "anti-war" statements were ... well, he doesn't quite say. It seems to be a rebuke, period, for the stars to have spoken out at all.

If no one sees a terrible trend going on here, they are deluding themselves. The American flag is being co-oprted as strictly a militaristic symbol, rather than a banner of freedom. And I point you to me previous post [link at the end of this post about my reaction if it was Republican actors, athletes etc etc.]

See here's part of the trend, i frankly don't care about muhc, but it's part of it. What if you are an athlete who is quite vocal in his politics. Now you are being made aware of the fact that if you don't shut your trap - outside of the ball field etc - then your chances of getitng into the Hall of Fame is now much reduced.

And I'd rather be on the side of Robbins' eloquence, than Petroskey's bull-headed attempt at .. again what, making himself feel good?

In his letter [of reply], Robbins said he'd been looking forward to "a weekend away from politics and war." He said he remained "skeptical" of the war plans and told Petroskey he did not realize baseball was "a Republican sport."

"I am sorry that you have chosen to use baseball and your position at the Hall of Fame to make a political statement," Robbins wrote. "I know there are many baseball fans that disagree with you, and even more that will react with disgust to realize baseball is being politicized.

"To suggest that my criticism of the president put the troops in danger is absurd. ... I wish you had, in your letter, saved me the rhetoric and talked honestly about your ties to the Bush and Reagan administrations.

"You invoke patriotism and use words like 'freedom' in an attempt to intimidate and bully. In doing so, you dishonor the words 'patriotism' and 'freedom' and dishonor the men and women who have fought wars to keep this nation a place where one can freely express their opinions without fear of reprisal or punishment."

Robbins signed his letter with a reference to an old World Series champion. "Long live democracy, free speech and the '69 Mets - all improbable, glorious miracles that I have always believed in," he wrote.


Inspiration via
Atrios link.
And I refer you to my comments earlier and reserve the remainder of my time.

update 13:43 !@#$% blogger. The archive link back didn't work for me. Just scroll down this page a few posts to "BLACKLISTED" under April 5.


April 09, 2003


I THINK WE CALL THIS ONE A DRAW

Not the war. Get your blood pressure back down. No I'm talking Albert Gore Junior's fundraising in a Buddhist temple. A complete an utter scandal. Hell if we can impeach vice-presidents he shoulda been tossed.

But now with a Newsday report about a former FBI agent who was a little careless with classified documents. I'd day it's at least a draw now. At least. Let's see, raising a few bucks or being a traitor for Republican Asian fucks? I report, you decide [to ignore it] [Hey, I've never used any lame shock and awe puns]

The former agent, James J. Smith, was charged in documents unsealed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles with "gross negligence in handling documents related to the national defense."

Smith had a long relationship with Katrina Leung, a Republican political activist in California who also worked for the Chinese government, according to federal documents. She is charged with unauthorized copying of U.S. secrets with intent of providing them to Chinese intelligence services.

According to an FBI affidavit, Smith recruited Katrina Leung in the early 1980s to become an FBI "asset" providing information about the People's Republic of China. Smith and Leung had a sexual relationship from that time until Smith's retirement from the FBI in 2000.


Link here via Buzzflash who also informs us that Agent Smith was instrumental in testimony about Clinton. What a fine upstanding agent. Full of character, eh?



A KILLING ATTITUDE

I think sitting behind your keyboard you can be as cavalier as you like about Iraqi lives and deaths. But when you're the one behind the gun, please don't be a shithead in what IS a military action of liberation. Right?

I especially - don't - like John Kelly's statement that the OTHER fighters are arrogant. With a mouth like that, he's got to have Ole Dixie as a masturbation aid.

'We shoot them down like the morons they are': US general

Hundreds of Muslim fighters, many of them non-Iraqis, were putting up a stronger fight for Baghdad than Iraq's Republican Guard or the regular army, a top United States military officer said yesterday.

"They stand, they fight, sometimes they run when we engage them," Brigadier-General John Kelly said.

"But often they run into our machine guns and we shoot them down like the morons they are."

General Kelly, assistant commander of the about 20,000-strong 1st Marine Division, said US intelligence indicated that there might be anywhere between 500 and 5000 of the fighters, whom he described as terrorists.

"They appear willing to die. We are trying our best to help them out in that endeavour," he said. [ha ha - oh wait wasn't funny the first time]

General Kelly said a captured Syrian fighter who had his leg blown off had refused medical help. "They are arrogant. They are determined," he said. The fighters were armed with AK47 rifles and hand-held rockets, he said. "We are finding them more dangerous than the conventional Iraqi units."

General Kelly said pockets of the Republican Guard and Iraq's regular army were engaging thousands of US marines who had entered Baghdad from the north-east after seizing control of bridges across the Tigris River.




YOU SCRATCH MY BACK I'LL - NAH FORGET IT

ICC. Three letters that meant a lot to the world outside the US. The one trying to get a world consensus on some basic issues of "good" and "evil."

The International Criminal Court seemed like a really bad idea to the Rove administration when someone else thought of it. Now there's a few US lawmakers who want to set up an international tribunal to try Saddam Hussein, and others of indeterminate origin, for war crimes.

The emphasized phrase below is perhaps what worries me. Is this another blanket statement - like UN resolution 1441 - that is supposed to allow the Rove administration to go for anyone, anywhere it wants?

WASHINGTON (AP) - Lawmakers called Tuesday for international tribunals to prosecute Iraqi war crimes, including suicide car bombings that have killed U.S. soldiers.

The efforts by Sens. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., Joseph Biden, D-Del., and Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., came a day after the government's war crimes ambassador said the United States plans to investigate and prosecute human-rights abuses with Iraqi oversight.

``We expect the regime and the leaders in Baghdad to understand that, down to the very soldier and officer level, that we will hold them accountable,'' Weldon said.

Specter last week filed a Senate resolution to create an international court on Iraqi war crimes after seven U.S. soldiers and three civilians were killed in separate suicide car bombings near military checkpoints. The lawmakers pressed Tuesday for a joint House-Senate bill that would more quickly push the issue to President Bush's desk.

It calls for prosecution of Iraqi government officials, armed forces, and anyone else, regardless of nationality, who ``order, direct, solicit, procure, coordinate, participate in, or supports acts of violation on the international law of armed conflict'' as defined by the 1907 Hague and 1949 Geneva conventions that set international standards for military operations and treatment of prisoners of war.
...
some human-rights advocates questioned how well a U.S.-backed, Iraqi-run process would work. They say an international tribunal, or a tribunal made up of international and local jurists, should be pursued instead.

Specter said the court should be represented at least by the coalition forces now fighting in Iraq, and Biden and Weldon opened the door for other U.N. nations to participate.


Link here.

Not that I'm saying the basic idea is bad, but as presented it's a perfect example of what Republicans seem to do best - be hypocritical.

(Link via EstimatedProphet)



SEPARATED AT MIND OR BIRTH?

Discountblogger points to this story about the Iraqi ambassador to the UN disclaiming any connection to .. uh.. Iraq. Whatever, indeed. Have he and the Iraq information minister ever been seen in the same room?
NB Mr. Discount also paid to see the Atlanta Hawks. HEE HEE. Course, I'm a "homer" too, so I completely understand wanting to see the locals.



CAUTION AHEAD

OK, I for one am not afraid to declare it - America has won this one. About 70 more American soldiers will die but this military victory is done. Only a few brainless people ever thought we would lose militarily.

So now it's a fair question to ask, "What have we won." Or to put it another way, "How do we define success." What's next? It's the question journalists ask to look ahead. Wallowing in the moment, without keeping your eyes focused ahead is left to those who like to wallow.

The USS Lincoln will be the first victory celebration ship coming home to Everett from the combat. They will thankfully be welcomed from the overwhelming vast majority of people. KVI 570 radio will try to usurp the celebrations as a right-wing "in your face" to all those who still think the war is a bad idea.

But the question, "What next?" will be completely ignored.

Iraq may be completely different from almost every other recent combat. They may be 100 percent welcoming and stay that way and accept everything American forces and the interim military government tells them. If so, they will be more American than Americans.

It is one possibility. But a judgment of recent history and conflict suggests many other possibilities.

Warm Welcomes for Armies Often Fleeting
52 minutes ago | By MARK FRITZ, Associated Press Writer

A downtrodden populace paraded with joy when U.S. troops marched into their mutilated metropolis. Months later, Somalis just as jubilantly dragged the butchered remains of American soldiers down the same dusty streets of Mogadishu.

As the British learned in Northern Ireland and the Israelis in Lebanon, occupying armies often find happy faces replaced by frowns and firebombs that can linger for decades. Invading armies almost invariably wear out their welcomes.

Just as it did in Afghanistan, the Bush administration on Wednesday crowed about media images of U.S.-led troops being greeted with enthusiasm as they rolled into the heart of Baghdad, the Iraqi capital. But in Basra, which British forces took on Monday, residents were already angry that their "liberators" had failed to halt widespread looting and lawlessness.

Iraqi society has been brutally suppressed for more than two decades, a span that also featured three devastating wars that some analysts believe wore down Iraq's military more than hardened it.

People tend to be submissive when victorious troops first arrive, said Sandra Mitchell, an International Rescue Committee lawyer who has worked missions in Kosovo and Bosnia. Their priorities are finding loved ones and food, clothing and shelter, and usually the neediest people come forward with open arms, she said.

When the Israeli army entered Lebanon in 1982 to root out guerrillas, Shiite Muslims threw rice and roared out a welcome. When British troops intervened in Northern Ireland's sectarian strife in 1969, Roman Catholics greeted them with tea and crumpets.

"But when they began to put up checkpoints, barbed-wire perimeters and limited population movements, attitudes began to change," Mitchell said.


And in former French-colony Algeria, after elections were set up and ready to go, they were not allowed to continue.
Link here. An excerpt:
Although the FLN secured a majority, Islamic parties made a strong showing especially in the urban ghettos of Algiers and other cities. The most prominent of the new parties was the Front Islamique du Salut (FIS, Islamic Salvation Front) whose growing support has since changed the face of Algerian politics. In January 1992, the Government held a general election which resulted in a comprehensive victory for the FIS. However, the result was annulled immediately and a state of emergency was declared. Over the ensuing months, the military took complete control with the support and collaboration of a coterie of civil servants, military and intelligence officials, commonly known as 'Le Pouvoir' (literally 'The Power')
More context here.

This was about the same time that Kurds and Shiite muslims were being trampled back down after being encouraged to rise up against Saddam Hussein in a post Persian Gulf war.

[ Interestingly, another Hussein, Dey Hussein, was around in 130 when the shit hit the ... fan (See this link for context.) ]

People in the Middle East remember this. They are aware of such things.

So "caution ahead" is the sign for today, tomorrow, this time next year, and how much longer? This has been my constant position, though people with similar views will be accused of changing course and "going with the winner."

It could perhaps be argued that, in some small part, France's anti-Americanism stems from the American view that they saved the country from certain doom by themselves, without the help from the French and only marginal help from the British.

I have lived abroad. it was in England. I traveled through Europe. The general attitude I gathered in both areas (yes, I know England is part of Europe, but seemingly only by default) is the widespread perception that America has been and always will be about arrogance. An arrogance of never admitting a mistake, for example. Of declaring everything it does as a variation of "manifest destiny." Maybe that really is what America is about. But it's not a side of America that should be respected or appreciated.

I see quite a close correlation between American Indians being herded onto reservations and the reality of many Middle Eastern countries being shoved inside false borders, regardless of tribal or ethnic affliation and loyalties. And then we are there looking down saying "well these Arabs just don't know how to get along."

American Indians still bring their situation up and are often told to "get over it."

The idea behind American actions are often correct. The attitude and implemetation in serving these actions are often lacking. America does not seem to welcome long-term friendships, only opportunistic actions that help a country in the short-term.

It will be interesting to see the next time America gets into a conflict how current military men and women view what they did in early 2003. And how the next American action is "different."

Other takes:
HERE Pandagon
HERE Frogger with an open letter to the "I Told You So" crowd.
HERE Comments at Jay Caruso.com

update 18:32 Oh look, today the State Department advises Americans against visiting Algeria: By Associated Press April 9, 2003, 7:16 PM EDT -- WASHINGTON -- Americans were warned Wednesday by the State Department to avoid travel to the Sahara desert areas of Southeastern Algeria, where more than 25 European tourists have disappeared since February. The alert did not tell Americans to stay away from the North African country or advise U.S. citizens residing there to leave. But it cited security concerns and suggested Americans "evaluate carefully their security and safety before traveling to Algeria."



April 08, 2003


CONASON TAKES UP MY POINT AND GETS PAID FOR IT

Though I wasn't - for once - paying attention to the national/war news much yesterday - I did tune in toward the late afternoon. And a few hours (OK 11 p.m.) after that I posted
something here about the mixed signals and words relating to the need to kill Saddam. In short, if it's not so important as they've now been saying, why risk many civilian casualties on a maybe. [because Iraqi casualties don't get reported??? ].

Salon's Joe Conason [his columns are free] leads with the same quote and makes the same point. Link here.

Hooray.



SNOB LOBS A LIE

TAPPED, via
Roger Ailes (not the FOX guy) says some esteemed journalist [oh wait not esteemed, not jourtnalist] over at the National Review created a Princeton Law School out of thin air to make a point about a supposed policy it could or could not have. TAPPED also has an update.




AGONIZING OVER THE AGONIST

Some of his information came from an uncredited source - Statfors. All of the information at his site is still as accurate or as inaccurate as it always was. Mostly it was/is timely reportage. He has not, from my reading, carried a torch for either pro-war or anti-war.

I think some of the attack is due to jealousy -
Sean-Paul Kelly received mentions in the NY Times and other places. I believe he has done so, not because of his claims for "sources" but because he quickly became a hub of information through seemingly tireless posting.

He did post early on that things not cited did not mean they were coming from him. I still believe, due to becoming such a hub, that he has some other sources we don't have.

Just my second blush thoughts. I've had time to think and the information he has presented still stands. And I would point to Matt Drudge as someone who comes up with a lot of bullshit misses among the hits he gets.

The Agonist has not been accused of giving false information. You might also think of how you yourself would act given the same circumstance. It might take a moment to get your bearings.

But I could be wrong here. I'm sure you'll let me know.







FULL-CONTACT CHRISTIANS

Upper Left Coast Review provides e-mails to two fuckwits righteous Christians blackmailing fellow US soldiers.

The e-mails are (and be nice) :
Chief of Chaplains
Maj. Gen. Gaylord T. Gunhus
gunhugt@occh-nt.army.mil

Deputy Chief of Chaplains
Brig. Gen. David H. Hicks
hicksd@occh-nt.army.mil




MORE KERRY
Kerry defends right to criticize Bush
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Mike Glover | CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (AP) -- Presidential candidate John Kerry said Monday that democracy affords rival Democrats the right to criticize President Bush even with the nation at war.

The Massachusetts senator has come under a withering attack from Republicans for suggesting that the United States, like Iraq, needs a regime change. Traveling through Iowa, Kerry rejected what he called "phony arguments" from the GOP that political candidates should mute their criticism of the commander in chief.

"This is a democracy," Kerry said. "We could be at war a year from now. Would we put the election on hold?"

Kerry voted last fall for a congressional resolution granting Bush the authority to use military force to oust Saddam Hussein and disarm Iraq, but he has been sharply critical of the Bush administration's diplomatic efforts to assemble a coalition of allies. Last week, Kerry's regime change comment drew fire from top congressional Republicans who said the remarks were highly inappropriate with U.S. troops fighting overseas.

Since then, Kerry, a decorated Vietnam War veteran, has defended himself, arguing that unlike his Republican critics, he fought for his right to speak freely. At an elementary school in Iowa, he reminded his listeners of that past conflict and the political dynamic.

"We had an election in the middle of the Vietnam War," Kerry said. "It was the center of that election."

The lawmaker argued that the disparate views of Democrats should be central to the 2004 election, including where the candidates' stand on how the war is being conducted.

"Let's not have a lot of phony arguments here about what we can and can't talk about," Kerry said. "We need to talk in America about the things that make us strong as a country."

Despite his attempt to focus on education, Kerry repeatedly was asked about the U.S.-led war against Iraq and his recent comments. Besides the school visit, Kerry has been meeting with small groups of activists during his three-day trip to the site of the leadoff presidential caucuses.

Kerry impressed some listeners, including Susan Lagos, an elementary school principal who has a son in the Army. Lagos wasn't ready to endorse a candidate, but she pointed out, "we teach nonviolence here."

She added, however, "I understand there are times when you have to confront the bully."




April 07, 2003






A WATERSHED EVENT - NO-BURN CROSSES
The Supreme Court upholds Virginia law banning cross-burning
The case is Virginia v. Black, where Black means "anti-black." The Supreme Court vote released today was 6-3.

If this goes down the way I think it will, burning a cross automatically becomes a federal offense. To me this seems like banning the burning of the flag comes next. The differences I would highlight is that flag-bunring is often a political statement directed at the country as a whole or some aspect of it. The burning of a cross - except in highly rare Christian ceremonies - is a statement of hate.
Justice Clarence Thomas, to shore up his bona fides (the cynic in me says) came out quite forcefully and coherently against the practice. The more reasonable par tof me says - well, he's never been a great advocate of free speech. See here

High court upholds ban on cross burning
By Linda Feldmann | WASHINGTON ? In a ruling with important symbolic implications, the Supreme Court has upheld the right of states to ban cross burning - marking a setback for many free-speech advocates but a victory for African-Americans.

The court, in a 5 to 4 decision, reaffirmed that the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech is not absolute when it comes to certain forms of expression.

By upholding a 51-year-old Virginia law that outlaws the burning of a cross on public or private property with the intent to intimidate, the court decreed that such an act amounted to a form of terror that could be regulated.


See also related link on how burning a cross came to represent hate.




ENJOYING LIFE

Not me, at this precise moment, but that will pass pretty quickly. No, I'm talking about Seattle's own
Voxbeth. I realized that very few people seem to enjoy blogging. I should immediately clarify that by saying very few people I've found or perhaps I want to read seem to enjoy it. I read a lot of political sites.

She gets to help bring children into this world as her 30-year-old self's job. And she gts to go to Frisco with her friends in a couple of weeks. [ASIDE - As the end of the sentence I typed weeks.com. How sick is that? I ... must ... get ... away ... from ... the ... computer.]

Beth has fun with her blog with a wide variety of topics. She also has a cool little system where comments are automatically embedded below the post. Or something.

She could be entirely faking the funk/fun. but if so - she's good at it.
Last night at work I saw two of the cutest babies born...not at the same time, mind. Most newborns aren't particularly coo-worthy, truth be told. I mean, obviously new mothers and families can see past the wrinkly goo-covered bundles of scream to see the beauty of their new addition, but a lot of the time I don't...I look at the child and they look just like they ought...like they've just been violently smooshed through a very small space and come out the worse for it. Usually takes a day or two for that shell-shocked appearance to smooth out into baby cuteness. But anyway, last night...two cute kids, right off the bat.


And don't ask her about Dr. Alter, she'll get very upset. [I may have just made up part of that sentence]




April 06, 2003

IT'S ALL ABOUT PERCEPTION
doDo I think there was any inherent racism in what is revelaed revealed in the strory story below. Absolutely not. Do I think there is a revelation of inherent stupidity revealed in the story below? Absolutely. If you were a muslim in Kuwait, what would you think?

It's all about perception.

And yes, I know 20-25 percent or more of the Kuwaiti population is comprised of "foreigners."
Only non-Muslims can apply for US base job: Advertisement
Srinivasa Prasad -- Bangalore, March 26
Tucked in the classifieds of national Indian dailies on Wednesday was an advertisement that could further alienate the Muslim community from the United States.

The advertisement calls for applications from "non-Muslims only" for sundry jobs at the US base in northern Kuwait.

The US base "urgently requires" lift operators, store keepers, clerks, typists, security guards and drivers. The advertisement insists that the applicants, besides being non-Muslims, should speak English and be below 35.

The advertisement was issued by Indian head-hunters Rehman Enterprises and Continental Mercantile.

Executives of these firms said they were representing a Kuwaiti company, Marafi, which has a "maintenance contract" with the US army.

"The Americans are strict that we should only process applications sent in by non-Muslims," Rehman Enterprises' head Abdul Rehman told the Hindustan Times on Wednesday.

"What to do? They probably don't want to take chances with Muslims," said Continental Mercantile's manager in Kochi TS Jairaj.

There is an unmistakable sense of urgency in the advertisement which asks applicants to "contact immediately with relevant documents".

"The response has been very bad," said Jairaj. "We are getting very few calls."

The head-hunters are in a fix since the executives of Marafi are flying to India to interview and shortlist candidates on March 31 for a final selection by the US army.

"The poor response is not just because of the war situation," Jairaj explained. "The age limit and the condition on English speaking ability are also problems."

The recruitment effort could be an indication of the US intention of digging its heels in for a long time in the Middle East.
update 18:19 04-07-03 Fixed !@#$% smelling pistakes.




BASEBALL WEEK 1
From my perspective - shorthand

A good first week. A lot of exciting play. Records falling left and left. All in all, a pleasant diversion. Two biggest bummers for me - Ken Griffey Jr. gets injured. You have to feel sorry for the guy. Have to. He's somewhat arrogant, but not nasty. He's not a money-hungry whore (as much) and most of all, you know it's got to be killing him to want to prove a point and get himself back into the good graces of baseball royalty - and hell, just play well again.

Actually, I typed too soon. That's about the only bummer. The Mariner's Freddy Garcia, if he had tanked again today would have been a sorry omen of things to come. But he did alright, in an 11-2 victory over Texas. Still, the Mariners are little blah so far. Lots of questions. Edgar Martinez got injured, but should only miss four or five games.

What else? Nobody come's out to impress it seems, except the Yankees. They did and they have, luxury tax be damned.

I am not a compleat or a compliant or a complete sports fan. I'm a homer, with loyalty to local teams being uppermost. Except in the case of Gary Payton. Where I am now a Bucks fan. It's not often I'll follow a player, but without Payton, the Sonics aren't a draw for me. They're going to the playoffs, the Sonics are not. To say Payton was the problem and get rid of him is/was farcical.

It wasn't the same when Randy Johnson left, as there was still enough of a good exciting team and the players I had come to enjoy left to watch. I still follow Johnson, because he's The Unit. He screams, a city dreams.

But, back to Baseball. San Francisco Giants and the Kansas City Royal remain unbeaten.
Division leaders (after today's games):
AL Central - Kansas City Royals 5-0 - really
AL East - New York Yankees 5-1 - typical
AL West - Oakland Athletics 4-1 - Bastards :)
NL Central - Pittsburgh Pirates 5-1 - OK
NL East - Montreal Expos 4-2 - really
NL West - San Francisco Giants - 6-0 [not missing Dusty are they?]

On the other end of the scale Brewers and Detroit Tigers are both 0-6.